The New Stuff

'Pixels' copyright notices took down the studio's own trailer


A scene from "Pixels."

Image: Sony Pictures Entertainment

No one's saying the world needed any reminders of just how wretched Pixels is, but at least this one serves as an object lesson in how broken anti-piracy laws and policies are.

Entura International, an anti-piracy firm representing Columbia Pictures, served Vimeo with takedown notices for a number of videos with the word "pixels" in the title. While the move was ostensibly aimed at eliminating pirated versions of the recent film from the video-hosting site, Entura only managed to inconvenience a number of independent artists.

Incredibly, the only actual instance of Pixels footage being removed was the film's trailer. Score one for Entura on that one, for wiping away at least one promotional source that could have steered someone into seeing the movie. Also removed was Patrick Jean's award-winning short film Pixels, which inspired both the premise and the title of the Adam Sandler film.

News of the takedowns comes from TorrentFreak, with the full text of Entura's takedown notice available right here. Among the other creators affected were NeMe, a non-profit group that hosted a 2006 short film called Pixels that was produced on a "shoestring budget" and "infringes no copyright," the group told Vimeo.

The takedown notice affected a number of other Vimeo posts as well, personal projects that, in multiple cases, pre-date the existence of the Sandler film. There's a student-produced music video for the band, The Pixels. There's also "Pantone Pixels," a 2011 project with a description that reads: "A personal project that took me a very long time."

While Columbia has every right to protect its investment, takedown notices such as this one highlight the flaws in the way the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) operates. The "kill first, ask questions later" policy at Vimeo, YouTube and other video-hosting services removes targeted content as a first measure. A subsequent investigation often clears up the confusion and halts the takedown, but only after the original content creator's been put through the headache of having their creation unreasonably yanked from the Internet.

Here's the real problem: The DMCA takedown process is a tool in the hands of cash-rich companies that have the ability to throw money at firms like Entura. It might have bitten Columbia this time, since the only actual Pixels footage removed seems to have been an official trailer. But what about those other content creators, the ones that didn't pirate anything and have now been inconvenienced simply for using "pixels" in a title?

It's a messy situation, and one that's unlikely to change until someone in Washington rolls up their sleeves and takes a good, long look at the current state of copyright law.

Have something to add to this story? Share it in the comments.

Post from Mashable at

Recently Published

»

Facebook is hiring a (human) AI Editor

...

»

SEC regulators are coming after ICOs

It looks like ICOs, shorthand for initial coin offerings, are about ...

»

Blue Apron COO Matthew Wadiak steps down in post-IPO shakeup

Blue Apron announced several changes at the executive level today, ...

»

$47 billion has been invested into ridesharing startups — here are 10 other things that money could buy

When the ride-sharing industry emerged in 2007, few would have ...

»

Sage Group buys Intacct accounting software for $850m

British enterprise software company Sage Group has agreed to ...

»

Wallflower wants to prevent cooking fires by making your stove smarter

The fire department responds to a home fire every 86 seconds, and ...

»

Node raises $10.8 million to find you better sales leads

The first step of any salesperson is to figure out who to pitch, but ...

»

Social media analytics company Synthesio acquires Social Karma

Synthesio is announcing its second acquisition of the year — ...

»

Facebook reportedly building smart speaker with touch screen

...