The New Stuff

Mark Cuban Commends Apple, Proposes New Law For Tech Security

Billionaire entrepreneur Mark Cuban is usually opposed to new regulation, but he thinks there should be a law to eliminate confusion in the next Apple security controversy.

While he applauds Apple for standing up to the FBI and refusing to break into the iPhone belonging to the San Bernardino terrorists, he suggests that going forward, there should be a ruling that would clarify when a government can request a hack.

Cuban tells TechCrunch, “I am for a law that is very, very specific on when a vendor can be forced to grant the same access as Apple is being asked to do.” He is only in favor of inspecting phones related to a “terrorist event where the person is deceased.” Cuban added that the law would also apply to apps and whether they would be required to provide passwords.  (The messages on Cuban’s own Cyber Dust app, self-destruct).

Yet Cuban said that based on the outdated All Writs Act, “it would be a disaster if they [Apple] agreed to comply” with the FBI’s inquiry.

Apple says that because of its upgraded operating system which links data to the passcode instead of the device, it simply does not have the capability to comply with the government’s most recent request. The information on the phone disappears after too many failed login attempts.

“We oppose this order, which has implications far beyond the legal case at hand,” wrote Apple CEO Tim Cook, in a public letter.

Cook suggests that going forward, altering its security would provide a dangerous loophole, that creating a “backdoor” to access the data would make the phone more susceptible to unauthorized hacks.

“The government is asking Apple to hack our own users and undermine decades of security advancements that protect our customers — including tens of millions of American citizens — from sophisticated hackers and cybercriminals,” said the note from Cook.

Many argue that complying with the FBI could also be deleterious for tech businesses. How would customers in other countries react to the idea of having their data potentially obtained by the U.S. government? And could other governments authorize data requests? It could be a slippery slope, suggested leaders in Silicon Valley.

Jack Dorsey, who is the CEO of both Twitter and Square, tweeted that he stands by Apple’s decision.

Google CEO, Sundar Pichai, also took to Twitter to praise Apple.

Aaron Levie, CEO of Box, quipped:

Donald Trump has in fact, spoken out against Apple’s decision.

Bloomberg reported and TechCrunch confirmed that Apple will be getting an extension on its deadline to respond to the court order.

Post from TechCrunch at

Recently Published


The dream of Polish tech entrepreneurship is almost over

Poland has worked diligently over the past decade to become an ...


Helping students transition from the laboratory to robotics startup

A student walked up to me at an event following Monday’s TC ...


What it’s like to ship yourself overnight on Cabin’s sleep pod bus

Cabin, the sleep pod-equipped charter bus, wants to be like the Ritz ...


Playbuzz unveils a new editor for writing articles chock full of interactive content

Playbuzz helps online publishers make their content more ...


SF city attorney seeks court order to force Lyft and Uber to hand over driver data

San Francisco City Attorney Dennis Herrera is seeking a court order ...


Playkey raises $2.8M to fund its US expansion

Playkey, a game streaming service we saw earlier this year at ...


Silent Echo lets you chat with Alexa over Slack

Want to chat with Alexa via Slack? A new bot called Silent Echo now ...


Dropbox CTO Aditya Agarwal is leaving

Aditya Agarwal, who came in to Dropbox from its acquisition of Cove ...


AngelList co-founder Babak Nivi out “for my own reasons”

“Mr. Nivi has no role at the company” AngelList COO ...