Originalism: What it is, what it isn’t and why it’s the most democratic option for the Supreme Court

By Brian Fitzpatrick, Professor of Law, Vanderbilt University, The Conversation · September 28, 2026

A majority of Supreme Court justices follow originalism, the mode of constitutional interpretation championed by late Justice Antonin Scalia. A former Scalia law clerk explains what originalism means.

More in Analysis

Analysis· The Conversation

FlyDubai incident: Airline safety expert explains how cockpits have become more secure – but only from outside threats

By Jeff Price, Professor iof Aviation and Aerospace Science, Metropolitan State University of Denver · 1h ago

Analysis· The Conversation

Question of whether taxpayers or fossil fuel companies pay for climate change damage heads to Supreme Court

By Patrick Parenteau, Professor of Law Emeritus, Vermont Law & Graduate School · 3h ago

Analysis· The Conversation

Antarctica’s ice loss is locked in, and extra snowfall won’t save it – that’s bad news for low-lying coastal areas elsewhere

By Yucheng Lin, Assistant Professor of Energy and Environment, City University of Hong Kong, Robert Kopp, Professor of Earth Sciences, Rutgers University · 11h ago